Pilot Rescue
$250
- One clearly bounded workflow
- Diagnosis, build or repair, and tests
- Recovery and handoff notes
- One revision within seven days
Automation Rescue Sprint
Fix the workflow everyone quietly hates.
One bounded agency workflow repaired in 48 hours—with a written acceptance test, failure visibility, and handoff notes your team can actually use.
Send the three-line scope No sales call required.Production Sprint
$750
- Up to three connected systems
- Validation, retries, and duplicate protection
- Test evidence and recorded handoff
- Two revisions within fourteen days
Care Plan
$200/mo
- Monitoring and minor repairs
- Two small changes monthly
- Monthly workflow health summary
Small scope. Production habits.
No giant “AI transformation” deck. We agree on a concrete test, use safe sample data, keep credentials in systems you control, and document what happens when a dependency fails.
Launch guarantee: if the agreed acceptance test cannot be met within the fixed scope, you owe nothing.
Low-friction first step
Know the scope before you commit.
1. Send three lines
Share the trigger, expected outcome, and what currently goes wrong. Sanitized details are enough for the first review.
2. Review a bounded plan
Receive a proposed scope, acceptance test, dependencies, and access boundaries before any work begins.
3. Approve in writing
Work starts only after the outcome, fixed pilot price, timing, and success criteria are agreed in writing.
Free browser-local tool
Run a private workflow preflight.
Choose an n8n workflow export and get five static reliability checks immediately. The file is parsed only in your browser and is never uploaded.
Need evidence before implementation?
Start with a USD 125 diagnostic.
Get an evidence-linked review of one bounded automation path, with the fee credited in full toward an agreed USD 250+ repair on that same path.
Synthetic data QA sample
See a messy export become a reviewable artifact.
Inspect a synthetic CSV/JSON validation sample covering schema, duplicates, missing fields, invalid dates, outliers, and a corrected-data handoff.
Inspect before you hire
Working proof, not borrowed credibility.
The public proof pack uses synthetic data and makes no client-results claim. You can inspect the workflow, run the tests, and see the exact evidence boundaries yourself.
Run the tests
Automated checks cover three routing scenarios and parity between the n8n Code node and its companion implementation.
View passing CI →Inspect the workflow
Review the importable JSON, synthetic fixtures, visible rejection behavior, and documented limitations.
Open lead-triage proof →Check delivery discipline
See the acceptance-test, security, rollback, evidence, and handoff approach used for infrastructure work.
Open VPS proof →A good first project is small enough to verify.
Good fit: one unreliable n8n, webhook, API, spreadsheet, CRM, or browser-assisted workflow with a concrete expected result.
Not a fit: an undefined platform rebuild, guaranteed revenue claim, or production access without agreed safety and approval boundaries.
Send the three-line scope